|
|
Statistical model
implementation
Statistical models
require a well established relationship between measured air quality and
meteorological predictors, which can be used to build up the statistical model.
This type of forecasting is most effective when there are clear relationships
between local meteorological predictors and air quality. Statistical models are
most effective when long range transport is not a factor, i.e. local
emissions dominate.
There are several types
of statistical models. The simplest forms are persistence and climatology.
Persistence is the most relevant and simplest method for short-term forecasts
and requires little or no effort. More advance statistical methods, such as
criteria selection, decision trees, regression functions and neural networks
can also be used. Statistical models do not generally provide concentration
values, but pool air quality into indexes, usually 3 or 4 levels of air
quality.
The following steps are
required for the implementation of statistical forecasts:
Obtain an archive of monitoring data for the desired forecast
components. Minimum of 2 years.
- Have access to measured or
modelled meteorological data for the corresponding archive period. Models
used are generally synoptic scale models, e.g. HIRLAM and ECMWF where the
data can be downloaded via web or ftp portals.
- A statistical model can be
established using the relationships between air quality and the
meteorological model. The relationships should be established between the
observations and the meteorological forecast model to be used as this
gives the most direct link.
- The model must be tested,
validated and improved over at least a 1 year period. Continuous
improvements can be carried out, depending on the statistical model used.
Prognostic model
implementation
Prognostic models can
come in many forms, dependent on the application. Accidental releases are often
modelled with parameterized plume models while urban scale forecasts generally
use parameterised line source and/or gridded Eulerian models, coupled with
meteorology to produce forecasts of air quality.
Prognostic models give
a spatial and time dependent distribution of pollutants and require predictions
for emissions, as well as meteorology, to determine concentrations through a
prognostic CTM. They do not require large amounts of observational data and can
be used, but not validated, where no observational data is available. In
principle the same guidelines laid out for air pollution modelling (see the
topic descriptions on modelling) can also be applied in regard to prognostic
forecasting.
The following steps are
required for the implementation of prognostic forecasts:
- Access to and expertise in
meteorological forecast models. This includes synoptic scale models, e.g.
HIRLAM and ECMWF (see links in the web section below) where the data can
be downloaded via web or ftp portals, and meso-scale models, e.g. MM5 and
RAMS, which would usually require in-house capabilities to run. The
meteorological side of air quality forecasting is often undertaken by the
regional meteorological authorities.
- Access to and expertise in CTMs
- An extensive emissions database
is required
- The model must be tested,
validated and if required improved over at least a 1 year period.
- If important aspects of air
quality are regional, e.g. ozone, then input from a regional CTM may be
required
Abatement strategies
Abatement strategies
used in conjunction with short-term forecasts are often related to traffic, if
this is the major cause of poor air quality. These include for instance
redirection of traffic, reducing speed limits at high-speed roads, and limiting
the number of cars on the road. The general concept is that forecasts are
required at least 1 day in advance in order to organize and inform the public
of any changes. Experience with testing the effectiveness of such strategies,
or even implementing them, is very limited. Such measures have an associated
economic cost and so trust in the forecast system and a clear understanding of
the benefits is also required. A specific topic description is dedicated to the
possible short term measures: “Short Term Planning and Actions”.
Short-term measures can
also be applied to industrial sources, when these contribute significantly to
the air pollution concentrations. These may include reducing or shutting down
production facilities. Such measures often have a more demonstrable effect.
Forecast quality
There are currently no official
guidelines available for measuring the quality of air pollution forecasts.
However several scoring systems such as skill measurement, which judges the
predictive ability of the forecast in reference to persistence, and indicators
such as the number of ‘false alarms’ can be used. It is clearly important from
a public trust point of view that forecasts are perceived to be accurate. If
this is the case then the implementation of abatement strategies is more likely
to succeed. |