Introduction
During
the winter and spring months in Norway poor air quality can occur during
conditions of light winds and strong stability. Poor air quality is generally
traffic related so for this reason the Norwegian Public Road Association, in
conjunction with the Norwegian Institute for Air Research and the Norwegian
Meteorological Institute, have instigated air quality forecasts for 5 Norwegian
cities. These are used for dissemination of information to the public and for
planning abatement strategies and health warnings. The forecasts are currently
made daily for the pollutants NO2 and PM10 over a 2 day forecast period in the
cities of Oslo, Drammen, Bergen, Stavanger and Grenland.
Forecast methodology
The
forecasts are made based on meteorological forecast input. ECMWF forecasts are
used to drive the HIRLAM limited area model, which in turn is used to drive a
nested version of MM5, down to a resolution of 1 km.
Meteorological forecast data is then used in the AirQUIS
modelling system to produce hourly concentration fields for the coming 2 day
period. AirQUIS uses line, point and gridded dispersion models to produce surface level
concentrations at a resolution of 1km and at predefined receptor points. An
emission database for traffic, wood burning and industrial processes is
integral to the model. Rural stations and climatological
data are used for background and Ozone values in the model.
AQ
forecasts are made during the evening and are available by 06:00 every day. A two day period is
forecast to insure that there is time to plan any measures that may be taken on
the second day.
Presentation of results
Both the
current air quality, from measurements, and the forecast air quality are presented
on a web site http://www.luftkvalitet.info/ (Norwegian only) for all 5
cities.
In order
to present the forecasts and measurements the different pollutants are divided
into 4 categories for each of the pollutants, figure 1.,
and the most polluted category is reported as the air quality.
Level
|
PM2,5
|
PM10
|
NO2
|
SO2
|
Colour
|
Description
|
Little pollution
|
<40
|
<50
|
<100
|
<150
|
|
Little or
no risk
|
Some pollution
|
40-60
|
50-100
|
100-150
|
150-250
|
|
Health
affects can be present amongst asthmatics
|
Very polluted
|
60-100
|
100-150
|
150-200
|
250-350
|
|
Allergy
sufferers or people with serious heart or breathing problems are recommended
not to go outside in polluted regions
|
Extremely polluted
|
>100
|
>150
|
>200
|
>350
|
|
Allergy
sufferers or people with serious heart or breathing problems are recommended
not to be in polluted regions. Throat irritations can occur in healthy people
|
Figure 1. Air quality index levels
used in the forecast and analysis
The air
quality is shown for all 5 cities for the next 2 days based on the index scheme
described in figure 1. These can be viewed in a summarized form as a table,
figure 2, or for each individual city as hourly values for the current day,
Figure 3.
Forurensning
|
= Lite
= Noe
= Mye
= Svært mye
|
Status = Slik luftkvaliteten er ved
siste måling
Varsel = Beregnet luftkvaliitet
|
Figure 2. Example of the summary
table of air quality forecasts presented on the web site
%20%20-%20Oslo_files/image006.gif)
Figure 3. Example of todays hourly prediction for Oslo shown on the web page.
The same
web site also furnishes current and archived (3 months) monitoring data for all
measured compounds. In addition to the web portal it is also possible to
receive email and SMS messages concerning current and forecasted air quality.
Applications
The air
quality forecasts are used for public dissemination and for the health
authorities to issue warnings for particular risk groups. The forecasts are
also used to plan short term abatement strategies. These strategies are limited
to speed controls for predicted poor air quality days.
Accuracy of the forecasts
Yearly
reports are produced to access the accuracy of the forecasts. This is
accomplished by comparing monitoring data with the locally predicted air
quality, i.e. model results at the monitoring stations. The accuracy varies
significantly from station to station and from city to city. In Oslo, for example, during the 2003/2004 winter season the percentage of
correctly predicted polluted episodes at individual monitoring stations varied
from 12% to 77% for the two highest polluted classes of air quality. The
most significant variable affecting accuracy of the forecast is considered to
be the quality of the meteorological prediction. In general the forecast system
is considered to be a useful tool. |