AQA methods
The following overview
(the table and figure below) shows the different AQ “assessment regimes”, how
the AQA methods are related to the requirements in the Framework Directive
(FWD) and how they fulfil various assessment objectives:
Method
|
Required by FWD
when:
|
Objectives
fulfilled
|
Monitoring
network
|
High quality
monitoring
|
APC is above UAT
|
Assessment of APC
relative to LV at station locations, with possibilities to extrapolate
to other places, when network is well designed, and source information is
available.
|
Medium quality
monitoring
|
APC is between UAT
and LAT
|
As above, but of
less, but sufficient accuracy.
|
Low quality
monitoring (indicative measurements)
|
APC is below LAT
|
Only to confirm that
the APC is much lower than the LV.
|
Modelling
capabilities
|
High quality
modelling combined with monitoring
|
APC is above UAT
|
Assessment of
- APC in space and time;
- contributions from source categories;
- population exposure
|
Medium quality
modelling combined with monitoring
|
APC is between UAT
and LAT
|
As above, but with
less accuracy
|
Low quality modelling
(or objective estimation) alone or combined with indicative measurements
|
APC is below LAT
|
Only to confirm that
the APC is much lower than the LV in the whole area.
|
APC: air pollutant
concentration; LV: Pollutant Limit Value; UAT and LAT: Upper and Lower
Assessment Threshold.
_files/image002.gif)
The word “low quality”
in the table means methods which are simple and often less expensive, and
having less accuracy, rather than implying poor quality as such.
Further description of
AQA methodologies in light of the requirements of the European Commission is
given in a technical guidance report to the AQ Directives:
http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/air/pdf/guidanceunderairquality.pdf
Assessment by
monitoring
Both traditionally, and
as required by the Directives, monitoring is the first “method” to use in AQ
assessments, in urban areas as on other scales. The differentiation in the
Directives between high, medium and low level quality (read: “accuracy”)
monitoring reflects the experience and practices acquired by the air pollution
monitoring community over several decades.
·
“Low quality”
monitoring methods, to be used both in the
preliminary assessment phase, and later when it has been demonstrated that the
pollution level is low, include e.g. passive samplers, simple manual samplers
taking daily average samples, etc. (see e.g. Preliminary Assessment methods
report: http://reports.eea.eu.int/TEC11a/en
).
·
High quality” monitoring
methods, which are required in agglomerations and when the air pollution
concentration exceeds UAT, entail automatic monitors giving hourly values or
better, with near real time transfer of data, so information to the public can
be given. The methods must comply with the accuracy requirements in the
Directives.
·
“Medium quality
monitoring”, which is to be used when the
air pollution concentration is between UAT and LAT, does not imply that there
are some separate “medium quality” types of methods. It means rather that fewer
locations may need to be monitored, and the intensity of monitoring can be
less, for instance covering less of the time of the day/week/year, mobile
monitoring stations can be used to a larger extent, etc.
Monitoring methods
present some important topics, such as: the optimisation of the macro-sitting
or network design, as well as micro-sitting parameters; stationary monitoring
stations’ classification (e.g.: urban background station, traffic hot-spot
station, etc.); sampling and analysis of polluted air at a particular location,
including calibration techniques (reference methods, equivalent methods,
Quality Control/Quality Assessment); indicative measurements such as the use of
mobile laboratories and the diffusive sampling techniques; estimation of the
human/economic resources needed to maintain the network’s efficiency. (See the
topic descriptions in the section Air Quality Monitoring Methods.)
General references on
AQ monitoring methods: see Additional Documents section below.
Assessment by
modelling
Use of modelling methods
is suggested under the new AQ Directives, to assess the spatial distribution of
concentrations (such as iso-lines in maps) and the
analysis of the causes of air pollution (by means of the emission inventories),
which have to be reported for zones/agglomerations where levels exceed limit
values.
Advancing from
monitoring to modelling involves some important steps: the implementation of an
emission inventory (see the Topic How to develop urban Emission Inventories?) and the set up of monitoring of
meteorological and dispersion data, and dispersion and/or statistical. This is
a major step for local authorities, in terms of additional expertise and
capacity. Often the tasks involving modelling are contracted out to expert
consultants.
Relevant items for
modelling methods are: the type of model and its choice, which is depending on
the application to be implemented; its input data requirements (meteorological
data or modelling and the emission inventory); the topography of the area; the
monitoring data needed for the model’s validation; using monitoring data to
improve the local applicability of the model; the needed results, deriving from
the various model runs, for example: evaluation of present Air Quality status;
contributions from selected human/natural activities or single sources (e.g.
industrial point sources, emissions from harbour’s activities, etc.);
distribution of population exposure (e.g. patterns of exposure due to traffic
emissions, or to industrial emissions in the nearby of an urban area); future
Air Quality projections, to evaluate effectiveness of policies.
General references on
AQ modelling and models:
·
http://reports.eea.eu.int/92-9167-028-6/en/tab_abstract_RLR
·
http://www.epa.gov/scram001
·
http://www.arb.ca.gov/html/aqe&m.htm
·
http://air-climate.eionet.eu.int/databases/MDS/index_html
·
http://www.harmo.org/
·
http://www.uwe.ac.uk/aqm/centre/model.html
·
http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/air/cafe/activities/activities.htm
·
Note by the CAFE-Working Group on
Implementation, Nr. 2003/3, Subject: “Air Quality assessment around point
sources”): Air
Quality assessment around point sources (pdf 20K)
|