1. Topic

  Terms in the EC Air Quality Directives: What do they mean?

2. Introduction

   

Introduction

As the responsible entity/person in your local area for the air quality and its assessment and compliance with EC Directives, it is wise that you obtain a good understanding of the concepts and terms which are used connected to air quality assessment and reporting requirements.

The Air Quality Directives of the European Commission, the Directive on Air Quality Assessment and Management ("Framework") Directive of 1996 (96/62/EC) and the Daughter Directives of 1999-2002 for specific compounds (SO2, NO2, NOx, PM10 and lead (Directive 1999/30/EC); CO and benzene (second Daughter Directive (2000/69/EC)); ozone (2002/3/EC) represent a new way of dealing with and controlling the air quality problems in Europe. The Directives prescribe how they should be assessed in a way which covers the entire EU territory, in terms which are sometimes general and sometimes specific, and how the assessment should be reported to the Commission as well as to the public, and how action plans should be developed to reduce the pollutant concentrations where they are too high.

Compared to the previous directives, the concept of Limit Value (LV) is kept, but the requirements related to monitoring, assessment, reporting, compliance and controls are specified in much more detail. To this end, new concepts, elements and terms are introduced which need to be fully understood by those who should implement the Directives, in order that the resulting management of air pollution becomes effective and harmonised in the European area.

This topic description gives short descriptions of most of the central concepts, elements and terms used in the Directives, to enhance the understanding of them. The concepts and terms are described in a more complete way in the "Guidance on Assessment under the EU Air Quality Directives" report (see the reading list below).

3. Discussion

   

Terms related to limit values and assessment areas and regimes

Zones

Member States must divide their territory into zones. This is a task done at national level, and the local level is usually not involved in the definition of the zones. Zones are primarily areas restricted in size, selected/defined such that they are suitable units for air quality management. A zone should be selected such that its AQ problems can be assessed and managed as much as possible without having to deal with sources and emissions outside the zone in a very detailed manner.

There are no formal requirements as to how the Member State should specify its zones, but general principles for this, and typical tendencies in Member States based upon practical considerations are described in the “Guidance report”. The Member States are to report annually the air quality situation in the zones.[d1] Zones can be large cities (agglomerations). Other types of zones can be small (possibly as small as sections of streets), or large (region of a country).

Agglomeration: An “agglomeration” is a special type of zone, defined as an urban area with population exceeding 250,000. Each such agglomeration shall be defined as a separate zone.

Practice in most MS is to use larger administrative areas as zones, in addition to agglomerations and in a few cases smaller urban areas which are also defined as separate zones, when there is a risk that the LV/TVs are being exceeded in them.

Limit values and related terms

Limit value (LV): The limit value for a pollutant is set such that concentrations below the LV is considered to provide adequate protection against damage to those affected by it (people, vegetation, buildings). A "limit value" is a combination of a concentration value (number) and an associated averaging time (e.g. hour, day, year,...) and (for hours or days) possibly a number of allowed exceedances per year.

Target Value (TV): This value (also a combination of a numerical value and an averaging time) is set with the aim to avoid more long-term harmful effects on human heath and/or the environment.

Upper assessment threshold (UAT): A value set at about 60-70% of the LV. If the pollutant level is above UAT, certain requirements of AQ assessment must be fulfilled in the various zones.

Lower assessment threshold (LAT): A value set at about 40-50% of the LV. If the pollutant level is below the LAT, the requirements to the monitoring are relaxed; assessment solely by modelling is allowed.

Alert threshold: A value for certain pollutants which represents a level of danger to the population. If the pollutant level is above this value, the population must be alerted without delay, for instance via radio (see Informing the public).

Margin of Tolerance (MOT): This term describes the situation that the pollution level must be phased down towards the LV, as the LV is coming into force. The LV/TVs are to be met in 2005 or 2010. In the years before that, it is tolerated by the Commission that the pollutant level exceeds the LV/TV, limited to a given “margin”, without corrective actions being required. This margin is made successively smaller the closer it gets to the year of attainment (2005 or 2010). If the LV+MOT is higher than a prescribed level in a given year before the LV must be met, the Directive requires that corrective actions be planned.

Assessment regimes in zones

The term "Assessment regimes" relates to the broad types of assessment methodologies that can be used: monitoring at different levels of accuracy; different modelling methodologies. In the directives, it is the air pollution level in an area, which determines which types of assessment methodologies the Commission will accept being used for the area. This can be broadly summarised as below:

· If the air pollution level of a compound exceeds the UAT, monitoring at high quality with high temporal resolution is required;

· If the level is below the LAT, indicative measurements, modelling and objective estimation methods will be accepted

· At levels between these two thresholds, the requirements to methodologies are less strict that when levels are higher.

Appendix 1 describes this in more detail.

Where should the Limit Values apply? Definition of "residential areas"

In principle, the LVs apply everywhere, except for at work places. At the same time, a pragmatic approach to AQ management should be taken. Exceedances at places where exposure of the population (or of ecosystems, in the case of ecosystems related LVs) is not likely, should not be treated as rigorously as areas where exposure is likely. An example of this is exposure to an annual average LV in areas along a rural stretches of motorways.

The question above is met when designing monitoring networks, and locating monitoring stations. The 1st Daughter Directive specifies that monitoring stations should be located:

· Where a population group is likely to be exposed to the highest concentrations that occur, for a period which is a significant part of the averaging period of the LV;

· So that it represents the more general level of population exposure in the area.

In both cases, the location of stations is based on population exposure considerations.

Local AQ administrators may want to concentrate their monitoring in "residential areas", in view of the importance of the exposure of the population. The definition of "residential areas" in terms of AQ management is then that they include all areas where a part of the population is likely to be exposed to high and/or typical concentration levels.

Terms related to assessments

Preliminary assessment (PA)

This term refers to the assessment of air quality before the Directive enters into force in order to define zones, monitoring networks and assessment methods. If a Member State does not have sufficient information about the AQ levels in all their zones and agglomeration, it must carry out the necessary series of representative measurements, surveys or assessments so that they have data available in time for the implementation of the Directives.

The Guidance Report on Preliminary Assessment under the EU AQ Directives is an example of a source of information on how to carry out a preliminary assessment (see the reading list below).

Supplementary assessment

This is the term for methods for assessment of air pollution which are used in addition to the measurements/monitoring of concentrations. These methods are creating an emission inventory, indicative measurements and air quality modelling, (which gives additional information, such as on spatial distribution of concentrations between the monitoring stations), human exposure, contributions from various source types, etc. This gives a better basis for development of effective action plans. Supplementary assessment is not mandatory; if not carried out, a higher number of stations is prescribed. The supplementary methods, and their results, must be documented and reported in the Annual report.

Spatial concentration distribution

This term is new in connection with EU AQ Directives. The assessment of AQ should now not be limited to what is measured at the monitoring stations. The assessment should in principle cover the whole territory, and for this purpose the so-called "supplementary methods", such as modelling (see above) are encouraged by the Directives.

How to assess if a zone is in exceedance?

A zone is exceedance of an LV, when:

· A station in monitoring network with suitably located stations(stations in areas with maximum and/or typical concentration levels) measures the exceedance;

· The assessment using also supplementary methods (emissions, modelling) indicates that the LV is exceeded at locations where monitors are not located.

The assessment should also indicate the size of the population which is exposed to various levels of concentrations above the LV.

Exemption ("derogation") for natural events and for other reasons

For PM10, natural sources can at times contribute significantly to its concentration. Since natural sources cannot be controlled, the Commission allows that exceedances of LV which are caused by natural events (e.g. sand storms, suspended soil dust) shall not be taken into account when determining whether the LV is exceeded.

Also high PM10 levels caused by resuspension of dust from winter sanding of roads can be exempted. These events have to documented/justified as being caused by such events.

Terms related to reporting

Regular reporting to the Commission

The responsibility for reporting to the Commission is at the national level. The local level normally provides their data to some national database suited for further reporting to the Commission. The following types of reports are to be prepared at the national level for submission to the Commission (see also Topic LEG4):

Annual Report: The Annual reporting from each Member State to the Commission has the form of an official questionnaire, to be sent in before 1 October of the following year. The questionnaire has sections regarding zones where LV, UAT and LAT are exceeded, reasons for individual exceedances, on methods, etc.

Starting date: The first Annual report to the Commission should be submitted before 1 October 2002, and concern 2001 data and assessments. Annual reports shall be submitted for each subsequent year.

Information to the public

This term refers to the obligation of the administrators to keep the public up-to-date on information on air pollution levels, as well as on the plans and programs for management and improvement of the air quality.

The pollutant concentration information shall be updated at least once per day. High air pollution episodes, where Alert levels are likely to be exceeded, should be communicated in time that the population affected have a chance to seek protection.

Reporting on causes of exceedances and reduction plans

This term has a bearing on the air quality assessment regime and system that a local administrator needs to set up. The Commission requires that causes of LV exceedances are reported – that this represents the basis for development of the local plans and programmes to improve the situation.

The administrator needs to assure that the causes can be described, and for this he will need information about the strength of the various emission sources (an emissions inventory), probably also air quality models as well as meteorological data which together can be used to calculate/estimate source contributions at given times with high concentration levels.

If the concentrations exceed the LV+MOT, the responsible authorities must develop a ‘plan or programme’ to ensure that the levels are brought below the limit value in time and send this to the Commission.

4. Recommendation / Conclusion

   

· As the responsible entity/person in your local area for the air quality and its assessment and compliance with EC Directives, it is wise to obtain a good understanding of the concepts and terms which are used connected to assessment and reporting requirements. The above text gives a first introduction.

· Further reading includes of course the Directives themselves, and the Guidance on assessment report (see references below). It is also recommended to contact people in other administrative areas in your country, or in other countries, who have already carried out the work, partly or fully. It should be noted that for cities the transposition of the directives in national law is the most relevant legislation for cities. In some countries the Ministry of Environment provides clarification of the directives and the corresponding national legislation.

5. Examples / Further Reading

    How to interpret the term “Hot spot” seen in relation to residential areas and population exposure ?
Definition of Residential Areas in the Netherlands
Short term air quality forecasting in Oslo

6. Additional Documents / Web Links

   

· The main Air Quality web page of the Commission (DG Environment, Air Quality: http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/air/ambient.htm

· The Guidance to Assessment under the EU Air Quality Directives report: http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/air/ambient.htm, click on Guidance on Assessment under the EU Air Quality Directives

· The Guidance Report on Preliminary Assessment under the EU AQ Directives: http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/air/ambient.htm, click on Guidance report on Preliminary Assessment under EC Air Quality Directives

Appendix 1

Relationship between air pollution levels (relative to Limit Value) and the Assessment regimes prescribed in the first Daughter Directive.

Source: The "Guidance on assessment under the EU AQ Directives" report (see web link above).

Table 1 summarizes the assessment requirements for the three assessment regimes.

Table 1 Air quality assessment and pollution levels

Maximum pollution level in agglomeration or zone

Assessment Requirements1)

Regime 1: Greater than the upper assessment threshold

High quality measurement is mandatory. Data from measurement may be supplemented by information from other sources, including air quality modelling.

Regime 2: Less than the upper assessment threshold but greater than the lower assessment threshold

Measurement is mandatory, but fewer measurements may be needed, or less intensive methods may be used, provided that measurement data are supplemented by reliable information from other sources.

Regime 3: Less than the lower assessment threshold

a. In agglomerations, only for pollutants for which an alert threshold has been set2)

At least one measuring site is required per agglomeration, combined with modelling, objective estimation, indicative measurements.

b. In non-agglomeration zones for all pollutants and in all types of zone for pollutants for which no alert threshold has been set

Modelling, objective estimation, and indicative measurements3) alone are sufficient.

1) Data quality objectives are given in Annex VIII of the first Daughter Directive.

2) In the first Daughter Directive this only applies to SO2 and NO2.

3) Indicative measurements are measurements using simple methods, or carried out for a restricted time. They are less accurate than continuous high quality measurement but can be used to explore air quality as a check where pollution levels are relatively low, and to supplement high quality measurement in other areas.

Last Updated


 

25th January 2005

Back