1. Topic

  How can the traffic infrastructure contribute to an AQ improvement

2. Introduction

   

Today, in most European cities, traffic is the major source of air pollution. At the same time, it is the source of polluting materials, which is politically the most sensitive as the infrastructures of most European cities require vehicles as mode of transport.

3. Discussion

   

European cities usually follow the following objectives when planning their traffic infrastructures:

· Improve cities´ attractiveness as a business location

· Secure equal mobility chances of its citizens (equal access)

· Support an organisation of traffic which is compatible to the environment and the city

· Effective usage of limited or scarce resources

Doing so, cities recognise the (re)modelling of public space as an exercise being part in an open process. Whereas in the past, those objectives were often seen as contradictory, today cities across Europe understand that their conjoint realisation is possible.

Most European cities have narrow streets and provide radial access to the city centre. Those streets have to host public transport (buses, trams) and individual (motorised) traffic at once. Yet, its narrowness does not allow sufficient space for a complete remodelling of those streets.

4. Recommendation / Conclusion

   

In order to increase the attractiveness of public transport (and cycling) and the quality of life of those citizens living at the before mentioned streets, the objective needs to be a (partial) displacement of individual motorised vehicles. A system of ring roads and tangent streets appears to be the most efficient solution. A good traffic infrastructure for such cities is a ring road system: an inner city ring to surround car-free city centre, medium ring road through less sensitive town quarters with a city-limit maximum speed and without single-level intersections, thus an higher attractiveness for vehicles than the radial roads, partly usage of existing roads recommended, outer city ring with high speed roads for traffic not aiming for the city itself, in addition: tangent roads.

The radial roads can at the same time be narrowed to allow more urban life quality.

This way, the following results can be achieved:

· Public transport becomes more time-reliable, fast, better as it is no longer hindered by traffic congestion (supported if possible by the development of an urban railway network),

· Individual motorised traffic is edged out of the radials but remains attractive enough in order to avoid traffic sneaking through residential areas,

· Commercial traffic is not hindered,

· Air quality of densely populated quarters is getting improved.

More radical measures to displace or decrease the individual motorised traffic can’t usually be as effective as the public appreciation of the problems is lacking.

Also such a strategy appears promising and is, for example, promoted by the City of Leipzig; the success of this approach depends also on the demographic development of the concerned city. Usually additional complementary measures are necessary to achieve the intended results.

Specific infrastructures providing benefits from the environmental point of view are tunnels and roundabouts

Tunnels

The use of tunnels in urban contexts allows the separation of long distance and local flows; the first ones moves in the tunnels with higher speed by leaving free capacity on the local road networks. Relevant benefits may be obtained for the reduction of gaseous and noise emissions of the streams running inside the tunnels and for the better circulation regimes created outside the tunnels by the flows separation.

Environmental disadvantages of such infrastructures are due: a) to the high concentrations of pollutants around the tunnels mouths and inside the tunnels themselves (walking or cycling paths inside the tunnels should be avoided), b) to the critical safety condition in case of fire inside the tunnel, c) to the need of spaces for the entering and exiting sloping links.

Roundabouts

The use of roundabouts in urban contexts allows the increase of the mean speed of flows thanks to the minimisation of stops at the intersections (stops and traffic lights are minimised), which may be concentrated in the roundabouts. Relevant benefits may be obtained for the reduction of gaseous and noise emissions for the better circulation regimes created by the intersection organisation. Environmental disadvantages of such infrastructures are mainly due to the relevant need of spaces required by the roundabouts geometry.

5. Examples / Further Reading

   

Examples of infrastructures based initiatives are given in templates Road Infrastructures and Traffic Infrastructure & Modal Split Targets in Leipzig.

Further Examples:

Bicycle use

6. Additional Documents / Web Links

   

· Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions “Towards a thematic strategy on the urban environment”: http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/urban/thematic_strategy.htm

· SAVE II HESAID Project Final Report (issued by P.G. Hoglund – Royal Institute of Technology of Stockholm)

Last Updated


 

25th January 2005

Back