1. Topic

  Tactical network models

2. Introduction

   

The urban transportation system is very complex, and its performance depends on decisions made on many levels of society whose goals and purposes may be in conflict with each other. The process of evaluating, designing and managing such a system can therefore not be carried out without the aid of properly formulated models. In fact, over the past three decades, there has been growing interest in the ability of computer applications and simulation models for all aspects of transport operations, planning and management.

The choice of the Computer Simulation Systems (CSS) to be used in transport studies is governed by the objectives of the analysis as well as the available resources. A common classification method for CSS is based on the detail level with which the incorporated models suite intends to simulate the components of the transport system. According to this, CSS can be conveniently classified into four categories that reconcile the differences between alternative modelling concepts and theories, as well as between different levels of investigation in traffic and transport studies. Starting at the most detailed (micro-) level, we have:

· Operational micro-simulation models that consider the characteristics of each individual vehicle and its interactions with other vehicles in the traffic stream;

· Tactical network models that are suitable for dynamic traffic effects analysis which are critical in network simulation during medium to congested flow conditions;

· Strategic Multi-modal transport models that are best suited to the urban-scale analysis of travel demand and transportation network performance and

· Land-use/transport interaction models that synthesise the dynamic interaction between transport provision and land-use activities.

3. Discussion

   

Tactical network models packages (also called congested assignment models) generally have a wider geographical scale of application than micro-simulation models. These can be used for representing a variety of situations from congested urban networks to regional inter-urban areas. In particular they are designed to model the varying traffic demand and congestion that occurs during the day and to represent the peaks of congestion as well as off-peak conditions. They are ideally suited to traffic management schemes and systems. Thanks to the dynamic ability, these models can simulate unexpected events such as incidents that reduce network capacity and the effects of driver information systems. Some CSS can also handle more specific requirements such as modelling special vehicle lanes for buses or banning turning movements in certain situations.

These models consider traffic as an aggregate fluid flow and divide the day into time slices which are used to model the build up and decline of traffic. Vehicles are assigned to their minimum cost routes, taking account of the traffic interactions and delays caused by other vehicles on the network.

Two distinct sub-models are usually incorporated in the classical CSS based on the fixed demand approach: the route choice model and the dynamic network loading. The route choice model estimates driver route choice on the basis of the generalised costs that includes time and distance related costs. The dynamic network loading represents the interactions between vehicles, both on link and junctions, and calculates resulting traffic flows and network performance statistics. These two sub-models are used iteratively until satisfactory levels of stability and convergence are achieved.


4. Recommendation / Conclusion

   

Dynamic network assignment models overcome the limitations of static assignment models by capturing the dynamics of congestion formation and dissipation associated with traffic peak periods. This enables the evaluation of a wide array of congestion relief measures, which could include both supply-side and demand-orientated measures.

Classical tactical network models packages exclude trip generation, distribution and modal split elements and are therefore suitable for evaluating schemes or policies which will only cause local re-routing of traffic. Nevertheless recent extensions to the classical route choice models framework focus on the explicit modelling of departure time choice that allows the continuous splitting of a static Origin Destination (O-D) matrix over the time of the day on the basis of the traffic condition (Metropolis computer simulation software).

On the basis of the description above the tactical models may be synthetically aggregated in the following main functional categories:

· Data processing;

· General traffic;

· Safety & accident records;

· Signal timing & warrants;

· Simulation & analysis;

· Traffic control;

· Traffic maintenance;

· Transit operations;

· Transit planning.

Typical application phases for these models are the demand assignment and the operation of multimodal transport systems within urban or regional transportation planning, feasibility studies of new infrastructure, network upgrading and specific operational measures application in private and public transport systems.

The advantages of tactical network models are also that they produce output statistics which provide useful details on the speed-cycle for emissions and fuel consumption analysis, although aggregated on traffic flows and not available for each vehicle. The application of tactical networks models to air quality analysis is suitable and advisable.


5. Examples / Further Reading

   

An extended list of tactical network models within this category includes:

  • Accident Records Summary and Diagrams
  • ARCADY
  • Arterial Analysis Package Executive
  • ATMS
  • Automated Transit Ridership
  • AUTOMUTS
  • AWSC
  • Berkeley Traffic System
  • Bottleneck Traffic Simulator
  • Bus Transit Garage Space Requirements Model
  • CAM
  • CAPSSI
  • Chapel Hill Scheduled Interactive Bus Scheduler
    CINCH
  • CIRCAP
  • CONDUFIL
  • CORFLO
  • Cost Allocation Applications
  • COUNTS PC
  • CROSSIG
  • DAITA
  • Days OFF CALCULATOR
    DELAY
  • Disaggregate Elasticity Model
  • dQUEUE
  • DYNEMO
  • EZ-POSIT
  • EZ-TRANSYT PLUS
  • EZVIPAS
  • FAZWEAVE
  • Fixed Guidewat Transit
  • Fleetmax
  • FLOCOUNT
  • Florida LOS Worksheets
  • FRESIM
  • FREWAY
  • FRIOP
  • Grade Severity Rating System
  • HCM
  • Highway Capacity Software
  • HISAFE
  • HISAM
  • Hyperplan
  • Integrated Queue Analysis Package
  • INTEGRATION
  • Inventory CTRL
  • KAR
  • KARS
  • LINKFLO/INTCAP
  • LTAP
  • MAXBAND
  • MAXVOL
  • MOST
  • Moving Vehicle Run Analysis Package
  • MultiLeg
  • NCAP
  • North Dakota Sign Management System
  • NOSTOP
  • OSCADY
  • Paratransit Vehicle Maintenance
  • PASSER
  • PCSPEED
    PEDCTS
    PICADY
  • PRENETSIM
  • PREPASSR
  • PRETRANSYT
  • Progression Graphics and Optimization
  • Progression Through a Series of Intersections
  • P2BAT
  • Queue
  • QUEWZ
  • QUICK
  • Roadrunner
  • ROADSIDE
  • RPT Spreadsheets
  • Safety Resource Allocation Program
  • SALLIE
  • SAT_ADJ
  • SCARS
  • SCCOLD
  • Section 15 Tansit Agency Performance Data
  • Service Planning Case Studies
  • SIDRA
  • SIGCAP
  • SIGEVAL
  • SIGN
  • SIGNS
  • SIGNAL
  • Signal Network Animated Graphics
  • Sign Inventory System
  • SIGPAK
  • SIP
  • SIPA
  • SOAP
  • SPANWIRE
  • SpeedPlot
  • SST3
  • Statistical Sampling of Trip Data
  • SUPERDET
  • SYNCHRO
  • TAPM
  • TBASE
  • TDIP
  • TEAPAC
  • TED
  • TEXAS
  • TGAP
  • TIMACS
  • TOPDOG
  • TOSS
  • Traffic Collision Diagram Library
  • Traffic Control Plan Library
  • Traffic Information Program Series
  • TRAFFICQ
  • Traffic Signal Design Library
  • TRAF-NETSIM
  • TRANNET
  • Transit Route Planning CAI Course
  • Transit Spreadsheet Applications
  • TRANSYT
  • TURNFLOW
  • TURNS
  • TOTOR
  • TS/PP-DRAFT
  • UCB
  • UNSIG
  • VEHCTS
  • Vehicle CTRL
  • VISSIM
  • VIsVAP
  • WARRANT
  • WARRANTS
  • WEST
  • WHICH
  • WINUNSIG


Further Examples:

The Bristol Area Transport Study Model
Traffic simulation models used in Utrecht

6. Additional Documents / Web Links

   

Further information on functionality and features of the software packages for micro-simulation are available at the following WEB site: www.contram.com (CONTRAM), www.dynamictrafficassignment.org (DYNAMIT and DYNASMART), www.wsatkins.com (SATURN) and www.adpc.be (METROPOLIS).

Other related references:

· University of Florida, Transportation Research Center, McTrans http://www-mctrans.ce.ufl.edu/

· PTV AG http://www.ptv.de/

Last Updated


 

25th January 2005

Back