1. Topic |
|
|
Waste Burning – A solution to combat air pollution?
|
|
2. Introduction |
|
|
When waste cannot be
reduced, reused or recycled, it has to be treated in a different way. There are
two main ways of dealing with this type of waste: incineration (burning at high
temperature) and landfills. Incineration reduces the volume of waste that has
to be disposed in landfills by up to 90%, and its weight by 60-70%. It releases
energy to supply power or heating. Special incinerators can even handle
hazardous waste and the burning process reduces the toxicity of organic
compounds. However, incineration may produce toxins and heavy metals that have
to be kept out of the atmosphere by installing expensive filters. In the end, when these filters are highly contaminated, they
end up in landfill sites.
Both incineration and landfill can
create severe environmental damage and have to be controlled particularly well.
We will concentrate on the first case. |
|
3. Discussion |
|
|
At EU
level, there are new measures that aim at preventing or reducing as much as
possible negative effects on the air caused by the incineration and
co-incineration of wastes. Air pollution caused by emissions should be reduced
and the risks to human health as well. Only stringent operational conditions,
technical requirements and emission limit values for waste incineration and
co-incineration can help contribute to this reduction. With the new
legislation, considerable reductions will be achieved for NOx,
SO2, HCl and heavy metals. In the EU,
cadmium emissions are expected to fall from 16 tonnes per year in 1995 to
around 1 tonne in 2005. Over the same period, mercury emissions should fall
from an annual 36 tonnes to around 7 tonnes. Although this new legislation
covers all wastes, it is clear that the largest source of emissions of dioxins
and furans into the atmosphere is caused by the non-hazardous waste burning.
The new legislation will reduce such emissions from incineration from an annual
2,400 grams in 1995 to only 10 grams after full implementation in 2005. It also
introduces stricter provisions than those found in the existing municipal waste
incineration Directives (89/369/EEC and 89/429/EEC) and in the existing
hazardous waste incineration Directive (94/67/EC), which would be repealed.
However, it excludes some forms of waste such as biomass and experimental
plants. It is obvious that incineration contributes enormously to air
pollution, but incineration is the last action that has to be carried out when
none of the other solutions can be applied (prevention of waste, recovery
through reuse-recycling or energy recovery or improved treatment conditions). |
|
4. Recommendation / Conclusion |
|
|
Although Directive 00/76/EC is
already enforceable (here are some provisions for existing plants, to be
implemented as from 28.12.05, but for the new plants, this is in force since
28.12.02) the other ways of making good use of waste are more recommended and
cause less pollution (prevention of waste -the best one-, recovery through
reuse, recycling, energy recovery and improved treatment conditions). Landfill
of waste should be considered as the very last option. |
|
|
6. Additional Documents /
Web Links |
|
|
·
Scope of Waste
legislation: http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/wasteinc/scope.htm#scope
·
Waste Framework
Directive 1975/42/EEC.
·
Incineration of waste Directive
2000/76/EC, OJ L332, p. 91, 28.12.00
·
Incineration of
hazardous waste directive 1994/67/EC and non-hazardous waste directive
89/369/EEC and 89/429/EEC (the three will be repealed from 28.12.05).
·
Communication on
Community Strategy for Dioxins, Furans and Polychlorinated Byphenyls
Com(2001) 593 final, 14.10.01.
·
Incineration of
hazardous (formerly Directive 94/67/EC) and Toxic Waste Decisions.
·
Limits the dioxins emitted during incineration
Directive.
·
EU waste studies published by the European
Commission: http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/waste/studies/index.htm. |
|
Last Updated |
|
|
25th January 2005 |
|