1. Topic

  Managing air quality on limited resources

2. Introduction

   

Most cities do not have a dedicated income stream to provide funds to monitor air pollution in their cities. Ideally a pollution tax imposed on major polluters would provide an income stream to develop and maintain monitoring networks and to maintain the dedicated teams of skilled personnel to manage and carry out the process. In the absence of such funding it is necessary to convince local people and politicians to make core funding available and to support bids for partnership working with whoever is prepared to partner the authority. The attached example from Bristol gives methods we have used successfully.

3. Discussion

   

Government Sources

The individual governments within the EU have been given the task of setting up national networks for air pollution to comply with the Framework and subsequent daughter directives. Approaches can be made to government for joint training, provision of equipment and on site operation of their equipment. Everyone is looking to trim budgets and this approach can work where government agencies are prepared to work with cities.

Government Contracts

Cities should not be prevented from bidding to take part in government monitoring activities. Being ‘on the spot’ the cities can provide local eyes and ears for monitoring exercises run on the governments behalf by consultancies or other agencies. Joint City / Government partnerships are to be promoted as a forward step.

Local Government Contracts

Neighbouring local authorities can club together to jointly fund monitoring campaigns across their region and can appoint the skilled resources jointly that cannot be justified by individual authorities. Savings can be made by joint purchases attracting discounts and similarly joint servicing contracts again attracting savings and a single regional standard.

Private Contracts

The same local site operator service can also offered to private concerns that are required to monitor or model in terms of their planning consents. This may or may not include the provision and or operation of the monitoring equipment. There may be a slight conflict of interest here depending whether this is within or outside the city boundary and local rules may apply.

Development Agreements

Where planning is not appropriate or as a contingency to pay for mitigation measures it may be possible to enter agreements with the developer on major plans to cover monitoring and mitigation measures over 5 to 10 years into the future. Large sums are usually involved with mitigation being triggered by monitoring paid for by the developer.

European Projects

Although in general only items triggered by the project can be charged there is usually a management fee or overhead that helps contribute to general running costs. This element usually is settled at the outset of the project and may be in the range of 5 to 15%. Some external training projects pay almost the full cost of providing trainers including their hourly rate.

Funding can however tie in more closely with locally needed projects so that external funding pays a high proportion of your project costs.

Commercial Sponsorship

In a few limited cases commercial sponsorship may be sought for particular items of equipment. This is particularly appropriate where you have a major supplier in your city where you are willing to ‘showcase’ the equipment supplied. In some cases ‘associations’ of polluters may be prepared to sponsor or provide equipment or resources.

4. Recommendation / Conclusion

   

Recommendations

· Look for all possible funding sources. Sources can be difficult to acquire but once acquired may last for a number of years without too much additional effort.

· It can take several years for new sources to come on stream so you must look and plan ahead. Occasionally funding is only paid out at the end of a project and not when expenditure is actually being made.

· Think originally, never mind it has not been done before!

Conclusion

Look for and use whatever funding sources come your way provided they aid the work you do rather than hinder it.

5. Examples / Further Reading

    Air Quality Index Board at Leipzig
Managing Air Quality on Limited Resources in Leipzig
Managing Air Quality on limited Resources In Bristol
Funding for Air Quality in the UK Using Supplementary Credit Approval and Planning Legislation
Managing air quality on limited resources in Utrecht
Raising the profile of air quality issues in Utrecht to attract resources
Ways of increasing resources for AQ in Utrecht by working jointly with other city sectors
Air Quality Management and Available Economic Resources

6. Additional Documents / Web Links

   

· Webpage providing examples of co-operative working by a group of Local Authorities in Sussex, UK http://www.sussex-air.net/

· Environmental economics studies made for the economic unit of Environment DG: Commission published studies on economics: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/enveco/studies2.htm#air

http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/enveco/studies2.htm

Last Updated


 

21st January 2005

Back