Introduction
Over a quarter of Bristol is predicted to fail to meet the
government’s health-based air quality targets for 2005. These areas have been
declared Air Quality Management Areas (AQMAs). Over 100,000 people live in the AQMAs (including 13,000 children) and tens of thousands
more work or go to school in the AQMA. The majority of pollution in Bristol comes from road traffic.
This Draft Air Quality Action Plan (AQAP) sets out a
package of measures that aim to improve air quality in Bristol and meet the government’s
pollution targets for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and particles (PM10).
They will not be sufficient to meet the target for 2005 but will aim to meet it
as soon as possible after this date.
The AQAP has been drawn up following government guidance
and the results of consultation and will be led by the Council, but will also
require active support from the public, stakeholders and businesses if it is to
be effective. There are many simple
steps that people and businesses can take to reduce pollution. Collectively
these could make a significant difference to pollution levels in Bristol.
The vast majority of pollution comes from road traffic,
therefore the AQAP focuses predominantly on transport measures
. Steps are also being taken to reduce pollution from industrial and
domestic sources .
Many of the actions in the Bristol Local Transport Plan
(LTP) will contribute towards improved air quality, but not quickly enough to
meet the government’s targets. The AQAP measures will add to the LTP to ensure
a more rapid improvement in air quality.
The AQAP identifies 27 additional measures, some of which
are new, others are enhancements of LTP measures or
the acceleration of LTP measures within the AQMA. The measures are listed under four main
headings; Information and Promotion, Promotion and Provision of Alternatives,
Managing the Road Network, and Emissions Management.
The AQAP
also identifies actions for national consideration which would help to bring
about local air quality improvements.
Additional AQAP measures:
Information and Promotion
|
1
|
Information & Awareness Initiatives
|
Promotion and Provision of
Alternatives
|
2
|
Travel Plans
|
3
|
Safer Routes to School / School Travel
Plans
|
4
|
Shorter Journeys (including Individualised
Travel Marketing)
|
5
|
Walking and Cycling Facilities
|
6
|
Car Clubs
|
Managing the Road Network
|
7
|
Reallocation of Road Space (Bus Priority
measures )
|
8
|
Improved enforcement of existing speed limits
|
9
|
Area-based speed reduction (20 mph zones
in residential areas )
|
10
|
Intelligent traffic signals (Urban Traffic Management & Control)
|
11
|
Traffic management at pollution hot spots
|
12
|
Parking Enforcement & Management of
Delivery Times
|
13
|
Motorway Speed Management (M5, M32)
|
14
|
M32 Management
|
15
|
Freight trans-shipment centres
|
Emissions Management
|
16
|
Reduce emissions from poorly driven
vehicles.
|
17
|
Vehicle maintenance- Roadside Emissions
Testing
|
18
|
Encouragement of more efficient vehicles.
|
19
|
Promote / pilot
alternative vehicles / fuels.
|
20
|
Advice / incentives for 'cleaning up' large vehicles
|
21
|
Retrofitting Smaller Vehicles
|
22
|
Scrappage Incentives
|
23
|
Bus Emissions Regulation (emissions
standards in contracts)
|
24
|
Promote and assist freight emissions
agreements
|
25
|
Low Emission Zone ( LEZ)
|
26
|
Road User Charging (RUC)
|
27
|
Clear Zone
|
These measures will also deliver wider benefits and
contribute to the core objectives of the LTP and national transport and
environmental objectives, in particular the Road Safety and Climate Change
targets.
The measures will be implemented over 8 years with many of
the simple, low cost encouragement measures being rapidly implemented and
sustained throughout the life of the plan.
Work can also commence quickly on some of the more technical and
comprehensive measures such as reducing emissions from buses thanks to a number
of pilot projects that are underway as part of the EU-supported VIVALDI
programme. Other measures will require longer lead in times and feasibility
studies, and will be implemented in the medium-long term.
The package of measures in the AQAP is estimated to cost
£1.2m in year 1 and at least £8.3m over 8 years (less than one pence per day per Bristol resident). This figure does not include the cost of some
of the more comprehensive measures that require feasibility work before an
accurate cost can be determined.
The ability to implement the AQAP primarily depends on
securing adequate and consistent levels of funding. If adequate funding cannot
be secured then the AQAP measures will have to be scaled down to reflect
available funding and consequently the effectiveness of the plan in tackling
emissions will be reduced.
How
much do pollution levels have to be reduced by to meet the targets?
Levels of pollution within the AQMAs
will have to be reduced by up to 40% (15 µgm3) if the government
target for NO2 is to be achieved. Particle emissions would have to
be halved to meet the indicative particles target for 2010.
How
can pollution be reduced?
No single measure is going to solve the air pollution
problem. It will require a package of complementary measures and a contribution
from everyone - the public, businesses, stakeholders and the Council. The government has issued guidance on the
sorts of measures that should be considered for inclusion in AQAPs. These include measures to reduce traffic levels,
manage the road network and clean up vehicles as well as the regulation of
industry, and domestic energy efficiency programmes.
The vast majority of NO2 within the AQMA arises
from emissions from traffic, therefore, the Bristol
AQAP focuses primarily on reducing emissions from road transport. There are two
main ways of achieving this:
• Reducing
levels of traffic and congestion,
This can be achieved by :
·
Providing and promoting alternatives to the car,
·
Measures to manage the road network.
These will mainly be delivered
through the broad package of measures in the Bristol Local Transport Plan (LTP)
with some additional measures set out in this plan.
• Reducing
emissions from individual vehicles:
The amount of pollution a vehicle produces depends on its
age, size, fuel type, how well it is maintained and
how well it is driven. Older vehicles
and harsh driving are the largest causes of additional pollution. Emissions
reductions will be achieved by:
·
Measures to encourage smooth driving and reduce harsh
driving and speeding (aggressive and fast driving substantially increases
emissions).
·
Improving vehicle maintenance (poorly maintained vehicles produce
high levels of emissions).
·
Encouraging the use of smaller, more efficient vehicles
and less-polluting fuels.
·
Measures to encourage the replacement or ‘cleaning up’
of older vehicles (older vehicles produce more pollution).
These will mainly be based on new
measures or enhancements of measures in the LTP.
A
combination of traffic reduction and reduced vehicle emissions is likely to be
needed to meet the government’s air quality targets.
Other
pollution sources include domestic heating and cooking and industry. These only produce a small proportion of
pollution in the AQMA and are largely being tackled by existing energy
efficiency programmes and ‘clean air’ legislation so no additional measures are
being proposed in this plan.
Bristol Local Transport Plan (LTP)
Road
transport is the major source of pollution in Bristol and
consequently the main focus of this AQAP is on transport emissions. The LTP
outlines an extensive £60 million package of transport measures for Bristol over 5
years, including improvements to the road network, public transport and cycling
and walking. These measures should help improve air quality in the longer-term
but there is no quick and easy solution to Bristol’s transport problems and, on
their own, they will not be enough to reduce pollution to the required levels
by the government’s target dates.
Air Quality Action Plan
This AQAP
will add to the LTP with additional transport measures targeted specifically at
improving air quality, as well as enhancing and accelerating the implementation
of some areas of LTP work which have the potential to significantly reduce
emissions. 27 measures are identified
in this AQAP, 10 of which are new measures and 17 are enhancements of existing
LTP measures.
Many of the
specific measures will be targeted within the AQMA,
however the AQAP will cover the whole of the city not just the AQMAs. This is because many of the journeys that cause
pollution in Bristol start or
finish outside the AQMAs. Many of these trips will
originate beyond the city boundary, therefore it is
important that the
Action Plan should be linked to measures being taken by neighbouring Local
Authorities. Of these only one, Bath
& North East Somerset, has an AQMA but both North Somerset and South Gloucestershire intend to produce Local Air
Quality Strategies to maintain concentrations of air pollution below the target
levels.
Air
Quality Action Plan Measures
How were the measures chosen?
A broad list
of potential measures to improve air quantity was compiled, based on government
guidance and examples of best practice in air quality management from the UK and abroad.
Consideration was also given to feedback from earlier air quality consultations
which sought to gauge initial public support for potential AQAP measures and
generated nearly 5000 comments and suggestions on transport and air quality.
These
potential measures were then assessed against the following criteria, based on
government guidelines, and those measures which were considered to be
inappropriate or not cost-effective were discarded.
·
Air quality improvement;
·
Cost effectiveness;
·
Non air quality effects (wider environmental, economic
and social consequences).
Air Quality Assessment and AQAP Assessment Methodolgy.
The Environment Act 1995 introduced a requirement for
local authorities to review and assess air quality in their areas. The main
aims of the review and assessment reports are:
·
To
determine whether the statutory objectives contained in the National Air
Quality Strategy (NAQS) and Air Quality Regulations will be breached in the
relevant year.
·
And,
if the standard is likely to be breached, to predict future pollutant levels in
more detail and identify areas where the public is likely to be exposed for a
significant period of time.
This process began in with the identification of the main
sources of relevant pollutants in Bristol with the Stage One Review and
Assessment of air quality in 1999.
This was followed by the Stage Three Review and Assessment
in 2000/01 which identified areas of concern for two of the pollutants
regulated under the NAQS – NO2 (exceedences
of the annual mean Objective) and to a lesser extent NO2 (exceedences
of the hourly mean Objective) and PM10.
Based on this assessment two AQMAs
were declared in May 2001 covering around 25% of the city. The Stage Three Assessment, in identifying
the extent of the pollution problem and scale of the emissions reduction
required, also provided the basis on which to begin formulating options for the
Air Quality Action Plan (AQAP).
A Stage Four Review and Assessment was then undertaken in
2002/03 to more accurately assess the nature and extent of pollution by
particulate matter (PM10) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in Bristol. The results of this broadly
confirmed that the findings of the Stage Three report were valid and the
decision to declare an AQMA in Bristol was correct and the area declared
was substantially correct. The Stage 4 work led to some modifications to the
(AQMA) with some minor boundary amendments and the extensions. The Stage Four
Review and Assessment also provided essential information from which to develop
and focus the Air Quality Action Plan.
In carrying out the Review and Assessment work and
predicting future concentrations of pollutants, the modelling process is
dependent on many variables, such as the weather, traffic volumes, vehicle
composition, vehicle speeds and levels of traffic congestion, the degree to
which buildings enclose the road, thereby inhibiting the dispersion of
pollutants, as well as wider economic and social trends. For many of these variables it is necessary
to include some level of assumption, interpretation or margin of error. In
determining these Council followed Government guidance and adopted a
precautionary approach.
The Air Quality Reviews will be updated every three years
to ensure that the information on local air quality is up to date, and annual
progress reports will be produced in the intervening years.
Assessment of AQAP
measures
Following the Stage 3 Air Quality Review and Assessment
work commenced on developing the Air Quality Action Plan (AQAP).Potential AQAP
measures were considered. A list of
potential measures was compiled, based on
government guidance and examples of best practice in air quality management
from the UK and abroad.
Consideration was also given to feedback from earlier air quality
consultations.
The relative cost-effectiveness of these measures was
estimated in order to identify which measures were most likely to be able to
deliver the most cost-effective improvement in air quality and which should
form part of the AQAP. The measures were
assessed according to government guidance.
A number of measures were identified as being
inappropriate for the Bristol AQAP or not cost effective. Many others were
judged to be adequately covered by the Bristol Local Transport Plan. A number of new measures or enhancements of LTP measures were
identified and assessed in more detail.
To simplify the air quality modelling process and
consultation, the measures were grouped into three scenarios or levels of
action.
Level 1 -
Encourage & Inform, Incentives & Alternatives
Level 2 - Level 1 + Road
Management Measures and Regulation
Level
3 - Level 1& 2 + Comprehensive Emissions
Management
For each of these scenarios the potential traffic
reductions were estimated for the 9 main traffic corridors in Bristol and three zones for 2005 and
2008. These estimates were
adjusted to take into account predicted levels of traffic growth
which currently averages around 1.5% pa across the city. N.B these estimates
also include the predicted impacts of the transport measures in the LTP.
The emissions impacts were also estimated based on
predicted changes in traffic volumes, fleet composition and traffic
speeds. These are summarised in the graphs below.
%20-%20Bristol_files/image004.gif)
The scenarios were then modelled in more detail using the
Council’s air quality models (ADMS –
Urban.
These clearly show that of all the scenarios, Level 3 is
the only one predicted to widely meet the NAQS objective for NO2. This would largely be achieved through
emissions management, in particular an LEZ, rather than large-scale reductions
in levels of traffic.
Progress towards the objectives will be monitored through
the AQAP and further air quality assessments undertaken every three years
through the Air Quality Review and Assessment process. These will be refined
through updated traffic and fleet data as this become available and will allow
the AQAP to be re-focused if necessary to reflect both the scale of the
pollution problem and the main sources of emissions. For example, once the bus
fleet has been fully retrofitted the relative proportion of emissions from
other transport modes will increase and the focus of emissions reductions measures
will shift to these vehicles.
The modelling and assessment process will also incorporate
other changes such as the predicted impacts of the next full LTP, and new
technologies such as zero-emissions vehicles when they become available.
Consultation Process
Consultation is an ongoing process of public and
stakeholder involvement including updates, feedback on process and further
consultation on major AQAP proposals.
This process aims to inform and improve the public’s understanding of
air quality and transport issues and provide an opportunity for people to
comment and inform the development of Bristol’s air pollution management
strategies.
The Environment Act 1995 and subsequent detailed guidance
on air quality management, makes clear the need for a strong, coherent approach
to consultation. This reflects a
widespread change within central and local government towards more effective
local democracy and fuller more regular public participation. The Local Transport Plan guidance states that
a genuinely inclusive approach will be vital if authorities are going to
achieve the widespread support necessary.
Care has been taken to ensure that the methods of
involving the public follow the approach set out in the National Society for
Clean Air and Environmental Protection’s ‘Consultation: How to Guide’ in line
with the following principles:
n
Overall,
agreed process,
n
Flexibility,
n
Clear scope,
n
Openness,
honesty, trust, transparency,
n
Inclusiveness,
n
Common
information base,
n
Diverse
methods to help build common ground,
n
Shared
responsibility for outcomes and implementation,
n
Attention to
detail,
and the former Department of
Environment Transport and the Regions (DETR) guidance on enhancing public
participation in Local Transport Plans:
n
Early
involvement,
n
Interactiveness,
n
Openness,
n
Continuity
and,
n
Provision of
feedback.
The Council has adopted a consensus building. The process has initially involved
identifying the parts of Bristol where exceedances
are likely to occur, consultation with the public who live in or near those
areas and the declaration of an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA).
The next stage is the production of an Air Quality Action
Plan (AQAP) .
The purpose of the AQAP consultation was to establish what level of
action the Council should take to tackle the problem of air pollution in Bristol and gauge the support for
potential individual elements of the AQAP. This was done by holding focus group
sessions, and by means of a questionnaire, in long and short forms (with the
short form available on the Internet).
The Council wanted to gauge the support for potential individual
measures and also on the level of action that needs to be taken. The focus group sessions gave an insight as
to which measures needed refinement or further clarification for inclusion into
the questionnaire which formed the main public consultation.
%20-%20Bristol_files/image010.gif)
A summary of the 3 scenarios
used for the consultation is listed below.
N.B. the three levels of action are cumulative.
In terms of three broad prompted
Options for a combination of measures (with an indication of their potential
cost/effectiveness), the respondents overall supported,
Option 2 (Option 1 + road management
measures and regulation)
or
Option 3 (Option 2 + comprehensive
emission management) |