Title of Example

  Mobility Management in Rotterdam

Example

   

Rotterdam

The City of Rotterdam welcomes many festivals and events and offers support in terms of organisation. Temporary events attract visitors and therewith, extra travellers. Additionally, events themselves tend to influence the accessibility of the city. In order to avoid a negative effect on the daily mobility and the attractiveness of the city, there is a need to make travelling as easy as possible. For this purpose, mobility management is used. The Rotterdam Marathon and the World Port Days are examples of annual events that attract thousands of people. During recent years, scenarios have been worked out to help manage these large visitor flows and the problems they create for the accessibility and the mobility situation.

The objective for the MOST project within Rotterdam was to promote the use of sustainable transport among the visitors that were expected for the Rotterdam Cultural Capital of Europe 2001. It became clear rather quickly, that the CC programme should not be seen as one event, but in reality consisted of many events, spread in time. None of the scheduled events therefore called for radical MM measures. However, the city still wanted to promote the use of sustainable transport modes by raising their attractiveness. Sustainable transport was promoted through the following measures:

· Special event tickets offered by the local PT provider, combined entrance fees with PT ticket.

· Special arrangements including an overnight -stay at a hotel, entrance fees to several events or places of interest of the CC 2001 and a reduced ticket for PT in Rotterdam.

· The route of the historical circle tram was adjusted to encompass most of the important CC event locations.

· An information centre, the Calypso, was the CC headquarters, which main task was to provide programme and event information. Additionally, visitors could get (personalised) information on PT, tickets, and travel information for special events (sometimes even available as flyers). The Calypso was a temporary institution.

· Close cooperation between PT provider and the event organisation committee

Additional services were also implemented for the European Championship: extra manpower, special time schedules, special types of transport (shuttles, group taxis), special ticketing, dynamic route guidance, dedicated routes for PT and taxis, detour routes for normal transport, clear and safe walking routes including good signage, special embarking facilities, real time information via the web site, info brochures for the public and own staff, 200 city ambassadors at strategic locations like stations or airport and infotainment centres.

Based on the data that were collected, Rotterdam CC 2001 was a success. The 524 projects attracted more than 2.25 million people. An estimated 50.000 people visited the Calypso, 47 % of these from the larger Rotterdam area, 29 % foreigners and 24 % from the NL. Foreign tourists, however, made much more use of the regular tourism centre to obtain most information. Periodical surveys showed that most visitors of the Calypso highly appreciated this service. Public transport was the most popular: about 40% of the (Dutch and foreign) tourists to the cultural capital came by train, tram/bus/metro or taxi, 32 % used the car. Another 10% used motorcycles or scooters.

Prerequisites for success are:

· Ticket integration: Combined tickets are well-accepted, especially when they are acquired automatically with the entrance fee to an event or other attraction.

· accessibility restriction combined with good alternatives (PT access, shuttle services)

· good PT and good parking facilities where it does not effect the accessibility of the city, i.e. on the outskirts or outer rings of the city and shuttle services to and from the event site.

· the cooperative co-ordination group, consisting of major players who take full responsibilities for allocated tasks. Thereby, transportation problems are never addressed only when they appear (when it is already too late) but they are solved through forward planning by regarding the specific nature of an event, its objectives, attractions and visitors.

Source: http://mo.st


Last Updated


 

13th January 2005

Back