Title of Example

  Traffic, infrastructure, land use and buildings Planning Activities

Example

   

Organization

Since 1982 the Environmental Section in Utrecht is a part of the Town development Division. The main policy was to give priority to prevention of environmental problems. So all policy plans and projects should be judged on environmental effects.

Procedures and tools

In 1986 in the Netherlands legislation on air quality, based on European

Directives, became operative. Yearly municipalities had to report about exceedances of the (temporary raised) limit values and measures to solve and prevent exceedances. In practice for projects this meant there had to be an advise on air quality based on calculations for every street with 4.500 or more vehicles per 24 hours in or concerning the project area.

The national government provided the municipalities with a calculation model: the CAR-model (Calculation of air pollution from road traffic). This model is a simple version of the calculation model from TNO. The RIVM supplies the cities with emissions and background concentrations.

Land use plans

In land use plans usually keeping enough distance between traffic and residential areas is the most logic measure. Sometimes a screen can shorten this distance (eg Voordorp along the A27 motorway). It is also possible to make buildings with a completely closed front (eg University College along the Waterlinieweg).

Building plans

In the case of building plans the air quality adviser firstly compares the new situation with the other road sections. Does this building plan have a more unfavourable influence on air circulation than the buildings at the other road sections? And is this building plan an undesirable limitation of the road capacity?

If it is, the building plan has to be changed: no high continuous front close to the road (eg offices along the Graadt van Roggenweg).

Traffic and infrastructure projects

Traffic and infrastructure projects are in most cases related to land use plans. New offices and houses have to be attainable. And there is also an autonomous growth of traffic.

The policy is making low traffic zones by concentrating traffic on wide roads. In 1986 this was the policy for traffic and the abatement of noise. If you only focus on the limit values for air quality diverting traffic to all roads would be the best solution. But regarding the exposure of the inhabitants and the large individual differences in sensitivity, it is better to have many streets with a relative good air quality and a few streets with maximum allowable air pollution. Now 80% of the inhabitants of Utrecht live in low traffic zones.

If a small street is a connection between wide streets there are several solutions:

  • stimulating the use of an alternative route (eg no through traffic in the Voorstraat/ Wittevrouwenstraat),
  • no standing traffic in the small street (eg temporary situation with many buses in the Voorstraat/ Wittevrouwenstraat),
  • less heavy traffic and buses (buses from a single to a bus-lane),
  • widening the road profile,
  • cutting down trees,
  • demolishing buildings (eg two houses at the Martin Luther Kinglaan),
  • changing the use of buildings.

Last Updated


 

13th January 2005

Back