Title of Example

  Model estimation of atmospheric pollution produced by vehicular traffic on the circular road of Mestre-Venice

Example

   

Introduction

Objective of the study, carried out by the Provincial Department of the Veneto Regional Environmental Protection Agency (ARPAV) and commissioned by the City of Venice, is the characterization of the contribution to CO, C6H6 and PM10 levels in the urban area of Mestre, caused by the presence of its Circular Road.

The Circular Road of Mestre is a trunk road that links the Turin-Mestre section of the A4 Highway (Venezia-Villabona tollbooth) to the Mestre-Trieste section of the same Highway (at the junction with the Mestre-Belluno A27 Highway and the ring road to the Tessera Airport, see blue map). It is 10 km long, but is one of Italy’s busiest highway sections. It is crossed daily by about 175.000 vehicles, and about 64 millions vehicles per year. All these vehicles, a large share of which are heavy duty vehicles (belonging also to Eastern European countries), cross the Circular Road both to reach Mestre, or to go, for example, from Trieste to Turin, or from Rome to Northern Italy. The passage of all these vehicles puts serious pressure on the atmospheric environment of Mestre.

Evaluation tools

The dispersion model used for the evaluation of the atmospheric pollution caused by the Circular Road, is ADMS-Urban, recommended to study the dispersion of the pollutants emitted by linear-type sources (roads).

Through the application of this model it has been possible to characterize the spatial distribution of CO, C6H6 and PM10 levels. Each receptor has been represented by the average value in time and also by the worst case, that is the maximum time polluting concentration obtained during the considered period. The temporal and traffic scenario refers to 2002, therefore preceding the structural modifications to the Circular Road which now consists of three lanes in both directions and which was obtained by using the two emergency lanes.

Input data

The input data used for running the dispersion model is as follows:

Traffic flows and speed: this comes from the Padova-Venezia S.p.A. Highway Company (that manages part of the Circular Road) and is experimentally surveyed every 5 minutes within a 24 hour period and includes a distinction between light (length ≤ 5.5 m) and heavy duty vehicles (length > 5.5 m) and winter and summer. This data has been compared with that relating to the rush hour only (7.30 – 8.30) and shared between light and heavy vehicles which is what was given by the Municipality of Venice Mobility Office as output of the EMME2 traffic model.

Emission data: calculated following the European COPERT III methodology.

Meteorological data: surveyed from the Industrial Area Authority of Porto Marghera monitoring network (wind speed, prevalent wind direction, air temperature as measured by the station at 10 meters in height, global or incidental solar radiation as read by the station at 4 meters in height) and from the Synoptic station of the Marco Polo airport (cloudiness derived from the tri-hour Synop data, spatially and temporally interpolated with those of the neighbouring meteorological stations belonging to the ARPAV Network at the Meteorological Centre of Teolo).

Geometrical data: the Circular Road has been divided into 57 links, including the access ramps and the junctions.

Output data

For carbon monoxide (CO) it has been observed that:

· the highest concentration (5.9 mg/m3) is associated with Saturday rush hour (17-18), in winter time;

· the simulated concentration does not ever reach the limit value of 10 mg/m3 (taken as the quantitative reference term).

For benzene (C6H6) it has been observed that:

· the highest concentration (62 μg/m3) is associated with Saturday rush hour (17-18), in winter time;

· the percentage of receptors whose simulated concentration exceeds the annual limit value of 10 μg/m3 (taken as quantitative reference term) is very high. In this case it is important to remember that what is reported, for each position in space, is the maximum value reached in the examined period;

· the average concentrations of the winter and summer semester have a simulated maximum value of 9 and 5 μg/m3 respectively. Both values are below that assumed as reference (10 μg/m3).

For PM10 it has been observed that:

· the highest concentration (112 μg/m3) is associated with weekday’ rush hour (8-9), in winter time;

· the percentage of receptors whose simulated time concentration exceeds the daily limit value of 65 μg/m3, not to be exceeded more than 35 times per year (starting from 01.01.2002, taken as quantitative reference term) does not exceed 25% of cases. Also in this case it has to be remembered that what is reported, for each position in the space, is the maximum value reached in the examined period;

· the average concentrations of the winter and summer semester have a simulated maximum value of 17 and 10 μg/m3, respectively. Both values are below the annual limit value of 44.8 μg/m3, which came into force from the 01.01.2002.

Conclusions

With reference to the rush hour, the Circular Road contributes to 17% of the total CO emissions, to 17% of the C6H6 emissions and to 26% of PM10 in comparison to the emission produced by the entire urban area of Mestre. If we add other main urban roads neighbouring the urban area (5 links of considerable length) to the Circular Road, the percentage contribution to total emissions during the rush hour in the extra-urban sector reaches 31% for CO, 30% for C6H6 and 46% for PM10.

For CO and C6H6, the concentration estimated by the model represents the contribution of the Circular Road to the overall pollution in a determined position (so called receptor) that, actually, adds to the pollution produced by the neighbouring urban roads.

Also for PM10 only the primary contribution has been calculated because it is not possible to evaluate, through the available information, the secondary one (associated to complex chemical reactions that take place in the atmosphere and involve various pollutants, giving birth to further shares of PM10 pollution, not directly emitted from polluting sources) and the re-suspension of ground PM10 (the most recent scientific acquisitions say that such contribution is relevant, but a reference methodology to quantify them is not yet available).

Certainly, even if not exactly evaluated, the secondary and re-suspension contributions to the overall PM10 concentration, measurable at a given position in the space, is extremely relevant; the evidence is that the historical series and the annual averages for PM10 measured by different monitoring stations of air quality (background station, urban hot spot station, etc.), belonging to the ARPAV Network present in the urban area of Mestre, are perfectly matched.

The annual averages updated to December 2002 are respectively 45 μg/m3 for the urban hot spot station, 47 μg/m3 for the urban background one and 45 μg/m3 for the residential area. The monitoring data portray a particularly difficult situation for 2002: the annual reference value (44.8 μg/m3) has in fact been exceeded in all the stations and the daily reference value for 2002 of 65 μg/m3, not to be exceeded more than 35 times per year, has actually been exceeded circa 78 times in at least one of the three mentioned monitoring stations.

Last Updated


 

13th January 2005

Back