Title of Example

  Relocation of business activities

Example

   

Relocation process of companies in Utrecht that cause too much nuisance.

In the last decades 60 companies moved from the inner medieval city of Utrecht to industrial areas outside of town.

This relocation of companies was part of a larger process of city renewal.

For management of the process of city renewal a new municipal department was created: The Department of City Renewal. This department organizes the improvement of houses, streets, sewage etc. A special part of the city-renewal was the relocation of companies that caused a nuisance. This relocation was necessary because the level of maintenance of environmental standards and safety legislation was modified. However,

some industries were relocated not primarily as a result of their nuisance factor, but because of basic property values.

The basic instruments used to manage the revitalisation process are:

- voluntary co-operation between the municipal administration and the companies

- partial subsidies for relocation

The process was managed on a case-by-case approach. To select the companies for relocation an instrument of industrial categories was used: only companies of category 3 and higher were selected. There was no forced prioritisation with respect to the sequence of relocation of companies. In that way companies could choose the most appropriate moment for relocation.

For every activity the nuisance was described.

Indicators for nuisance:

- the nuisance of the activity because of traffic and logistics

- environmental and risk factors (noise, odour, dust, risk)

Firstly, the real necessity of relocation was evaluated. When Best Available Techniques related to the type of activity made it possible for the company to operate without creating a nuisance, a contribution in the costs for these Best Available Techniques was given as a subsidy.

A company’s viability was also evaluated with the help of an economic screening which was done to draw a picture of the chances of the company in the future. Moreover,

the history of the company was verified: it should have been legally located for at least 5 years.

The city then offered a relocation area.

The company could do whatever it wanted to do with the old location. Usage for new industrial activities was only possible after permission by the city.

To prevent the settlement of a new inconvenient activity, the owner had to sign a so-called "carry-over conditions paper" by which a new owner also had to ask permission for the usage of the location for industrial activities. (After some years a new Land use plan prevented this settlement, so this "carry-over conditions paper" lost its value).

The contribution of the city was limited to 100% of the removal-costs and 50% of the re-installation-costs.

This relocation was a success:

- the contribution was enough to help the companies to a new start in more favourable circumstances

- the relocation-process did not lead to a "mono-functional" city without any industrial activity. This contributed to the liveliness of the town.

- as a result of the voluntary co-operation, no significant problems were met in the process of managing the process of revitalisation.

Financial resources:

Funds from National Department of VROM (Housing and Environment) for the renewal of town and villages


Last Updated


 

13th January 2005

Back