Title of Example

  European Common Indicators

Example

   

European Common Indicators (ECI)

Added value:

-awareness raising

-comparability

-trend analysis

Obstacles:

Time and resources, methodological problems, lack of data, broadness of indicators

Recommendations:

-co-ordination & aggregation with other EU Initiatives (e.g. Urban Audit)

-promotional campaign

-networking

-involvement of national institutions

-ECI common data standards (in line with recommendations from INSPIRE)

-regular publishing of data

Extract from the European Common Indicators Final Report

To view the final report please see:

http://euronet.uwe.ac.uk/www.sustainable-cities.org/indicators/ECI%20Final%20Report.pdf

The ECI initiative: 1999 preparatory process

The ECI initiative was started off in May 1999 with the setting up of a Working Group

on Sustainable Indicators (for initiative of and under the supervision of the Expert

Group on the Urban Environment and led by the French Environmental Ministry) with

the task to develop common (harmonised) indicators for local sustainability, in close

collaboration with a wider Group of Local Authorities. Since the beginning, the aim of the initiative has been to develop and test indicators reflecting local actions towards sustainability in as much an integrated way as possible.

The outcome of the initial phase was a proposal, suggesting a set of indicators on a limited number of themes, in order to allow the strengthening of some core methodologies through effective implementation. The set is however intended to remain flexible and open to include other relevant topics.

Further, ECI is characterised by a good level of complementarity with respect to

existing local, national and sectoral indicators’ sets, since it was not defined to displace or compete with any local/national priority therein reflected. In fact, the ECIs aim at representing local action towards sustainability in as much an integrated way as possible.

Indicators have been developed according to a bottom up approach since the very

beginning of the project, involving local authorities as main actors in the process and

improving synergies with existing indicators sets. This shows, on the one hand, to what extent its ethos is actually based upon understanding the real needs of municipalities,and on the other, the possibilities of achievement of policy objectives from actions that bridge more than one level of governance. If, on the one hand, the ECIs scope is to fulfil the requirements of indicators envisaged in the current EU policy perspective - in as much as they intend to promote an integrated and harmonised approach across community policies - on the other, they aim to ensure local appropriateness, valuing local and lay knowledge and the principle of subsidiarity. Both aspects can be traced back to the six Sustainability Principles permeating the indicators (see below). To qualify into the set, an indicator had to address at least three of them (= integration requirement). Over 1,000 indicators were analysed both against this requirement and against a list of general criteria. The most important, well-established indicators systems have served as a source of inspiration, as building blocks for the creation of a new system.

The outcome of the numerous and extensive consultation rounds with towns and cities,was the agreement on a list of 10 common issues/indicators Sustainable Indicators and submitted to various rounds of discussion

Sustainability Concerns forming the basis for the indicators’ selection (extract

from “Checklist”):

1. equality and social inclusion (access for all to adequate and affordable basic

services, e.g. education, employment, energy, health, housing, training,transport);

2. local governance/empowerment/democracy (participation of all sectors of the localcommunity in local planning and decision making processes);

3. local/global relationship (meeting local needs locally, from production to consumption and disposal, meeting needs that cannot be met locally in a more sustainable way);

4. local economy (matching local skills and needs with employment availability and other facilities, in a way that poses minimum threat to natural resources and the environment);

5. environmental protection (adopting an eco-systems approach, minimising use of natural resources and land, generation of waste and emission of pollutants,

enhancing bio-diversity);

6. cultural heritage/quality of the built environment (protection, preservation and

rehabilitation of historic, cultural and architectural values, including buildings,

monuments, events, enhancing and safeguarding attractiveness and functionality of spaces and buildings).

The ECI initiative: 2000 launching process

Environment Commissioner Margot Wallström launched the initiative at the 3°

European Conference on Sustainable Cities (9-12 February 2000, Hanover, Germany),inviting local and regional authorities from across Europe to participate. Participation is based on signing the voluntary adoption agreement.

The following activities have been carried out since the launch (up to January 2001):

· a survey was carried out by Eurocities in the summer of year 2000, to get a first idea of if and how participating local authorities were implementing the European Common Indicators;

· a first technical workshop for the mutual exchange of experiences took place in October 2000 in Seville (promoted by the Municipality, IPTS, Eurocities), to discuss in particular the initiative needs, in terms of methods for data collection and calculation;

· following the Seville workshop, 10 indicator-based working groups (IBGs) were set up, one group per indicator, with the responsibility of defining the methodologies.

Last Updated


 

13th January 2005

Back